Neural Regeneration Research ›› 2016, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (8): 1201-1203.doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.189160

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Selective neuronal PTEN deletion: can we take the brakes off of growth without losing control?

Erin A. Gutilla1, 2, Oswald Steward1, 2, 3, 4, 5, *   

  1. 1 Reeve-Irvine Research Center, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA 2 Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA 3 Department of Neurobiology & Behavior, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA 4 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA 5 Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
  • Online:2016-08-31 Published:2016-08-31
  • Contact: Oswald Steward, Ph.D., osteward@uci.edu.
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by NS073857 to OS, 5T32GM008620 to EG and generous donations from Cure Medical, Research for Cure, and individual donors.

Abstract:

The limited ability for injured adult axons to regenerate is a major cause for limited functional recovery after injury to the nervous system, motivating numerous efforts to uncover mechanisms capable of enhancing regeneration potential. One promising strategy involves deletion or knockdown of the phosphatase and tensin (PTEN) gene. Conditional genetic deletion of PTEN before, immediately following, or several months after spinal cord injury enables neurons of the corticospinal tract (CST) to regenerate their axons across the lesion, which is accompanied by enhanced recovery of skilled voluntary motor functions mediated by the CST. Although conditional genetic deletion or knockdown of PTEN in neurons enables axon regeneration, PTEN is a well-known tumor suppressor and mutations of the PTEN gene disrupt brain development leading to neurological abnormalities including macrocephaly, seizures, and early mortality. The long-term consequences of manipulating PTEN in the adult nervous system, as would be done for therapeutic intervention after injury, are only now being explored. Here, we summarize evidence indicating that long-term deletion of PTEN in mature neurons does not cause evident pathology; indeed, cortical neurons that have lived without PTEN for over 1 year appear robust and healthy. Studies to date provide only a frst look at potential negative consequences of PTEN deletion or knockdown, but the absence of any detectable neuropathology supports guarded optimism that interventions to enable axon regeneration after injury are achievable.

Key words: PTEN, mTOR, spinal cord injury, corticospinal tract, motor system, axon regeneration, recovery of function