Neural Regeneration Research ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8): 1785-1794.doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.332151

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dose optimization of intrathecal administration of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of subacute incomplete spinal cord injury

Ting-Ting Cao1, #, Huan Chen1, #, Mao Pang2, 3, 4, #, Si-Si Xu1, Hui-Quan Wen5, Bin Liu2, 3, 4, *, Li-Min Rong2, 3, 4, *, Mang-Mang Li1, *   

  1. 1Department of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; 2Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; 3Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; 4Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; 5Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-01-22
  • Contact: Mang-Mang Li, PhD, mangmangli@smu.edu.cn; Bin Liu, MD, liubin6@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Li-Min Rong, PhD, ronglm@mail.sysu.edu.cn .
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2017YFA0105401 (to LMR), the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 31671420 and 81602482 (to MML) and a grant from the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Joint Degeneration Diseases.

Abstract: Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) are a promising candidate for spinal cord injury (SCI) repair owing to their advantages of low immunogenicity and easy accessibility over other MSC sources. However, modest clinical efficacy hampered the progression of these cells to clinical translation. This discrepancy may be due to many variables, such as cell source, timing of implantation, route of administration, and relevant efficacious cell dose, which are critical factors that affect the efficacy of treatment of patients with SCI. Previously, we have evaluated the safety and efficacy of 4 × 106 hUC-MSCs/kg in the treatment of subacute SCI by intrathecal implantation in rat models. To search for a more accurate dose range for clinical translation, we compared the effects of three different doses of hUC-MSCs – low (0.25 × 106 cells/kg), medium (1 × 106 cells/kg) and high (4 × 106 cells/kg) – on subacute SCI repair through an elaborate combination of behavioral analyses, anatomical analyses, magnetic resonance imaging-diffusion tensor imaging (MRI-DTI), biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) tracing, electrophysiology, and quantification of mRNA levels of ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors. Our study demonstrated that the medium dose, but not the low dose, is as efficient as the high dose in producing the desired therapeutic outcomes. Furthermore, partial restoration of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor expression by the effective doses indicates that GABAA receptors are possible candidates for therapeutic targeting of dormant relay pathways in injured spinal cord. Overall, this study revealed that intrathecal implantation of 1 × 106 hUC-MSCs/kg is an alternative approach for treating subacute SCI.

Key words: effective dose, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, intrathecal implantation, ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors, spinal cord injury, subacute spinal cord injury, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors