Objective: To judge the efficacies of neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation on functional recovery following
contusion spinal cord injuries (SCIs).
Data sources: Studies in which NSCs were transplanted into a clinically relevant, standardized rat model of
contusion SCI were identified by searching the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, and the extracted
data were analyzed by Stata 14.0.
Data selection: Inclusion criteria were that NSCs were used in in vivo animal studies to treat contusion
SCIs and that behavioral assessment of locomotor functional recovery was performed using the Basso, Beattie,
and Bresnahan lo-comotor rating scale. Exclusion criteria included a follow-up of less than 4 weeks
and the lack of control groups.
Outcome measures: The restoration of motor function was assessed by the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan
locomotor rating scale.
Results: We identified 1756 non-duplicated papers by searching the aforementioned electronic databases,
and 30 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 37 studies reported in the 30 articles were included
in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that transplanted NSCs could improve the
motor function recovery of rats following contusion SCIs, to a moderate extent (pooled standardized mean
difference (SMD) = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47–1.00; P < 0.001). NSCs obtained from different
donor species (rat: SMD = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.36–1.13; human: SMD = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.31–1.25), at different
donor ages (fetal: SMD = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.43–0.92; adult: SMD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.50–1.22) and from different
origins (brain-derived: SMD = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.27–0.91; spinal cord-derived: SMD = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.22–0.79)
had similar efficacies on improved functional recovery; however, adult induced pluripotent stem cell-derived
NSCs showed no significant efficacies. Furthermore, the use of higher doses of transplanted NSCs
or the administration of immunosuppressive agents did not promote better locomotor function recovery
(SMD = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.21–0.70). However, shorter periods between the contusion induction and the NSC
transplantation showed slightly higher efficacies (acute: SMD = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.81–1.63; subacute: SMD =
0.75; 95% CI: 0.42–1.09). For chronic injuries, NSC implantation did not significantly improve functional
recovery (SMD = 0.25; 95% CI: –0.16 to 0.65).
Conclusion: NSC transplantation alone appears to be a positive yet limited method for the treatment of
contusion SCIs.