Neural Regeneration Research ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (10): 1787-1795.doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.238623

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Semi-automated segmentation of magnetic resonance images for thigh skeletal muscle and fat using threshold technique after spinal cord injury

Mina P. Ghatas1, Robert M. Lester1, M. Rehan Khan2, Ashraf S. Gorgey1, 3   

  1. 1 Department of Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
    2 Department of Radiology, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
    3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
  • Received:2018-07-12 Online:2018-10-15 Published:2018-10-15
  • Contact: Ashraf S. Gorgey, MPT, PhD,FACSM, ashraf.gorgey@va.gov.
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs, Veteran Health Administration, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (B7867-W) and DoD-CDRMP (W81XWH-14-SCIRP-CTA) (to ASG).

Abstract:

Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the “gold standard” technique for quantifying thigh muscle and fat cross-sectional area. We have developed a semi-automated technique to segment seven thigh compartments in persons with spinal cord injury. Thigh magnetic resonance images from 18 men (18–50 years old) with traumatic motor-complete spinal cord injury were analyzed in a blinded fashion using the threshold technique. The cross-sectional area values acquired by thresholding were compared to the manual tracing technique. The percentage errors for thigh circumference were (threshold: 170.71 ± 38.67; manual: 169.45 ± 38.27 cm2) 0.74%, subcutaneous adipose tissue (threshold: 65.99±30.79; manual: 62.68 ± 30.22) 5.2%, whole muscle (threshold: 98.18 ± 20.19; manual: 98.20 ± 20.08 cm2) 0.13%, femoral bone (threshold: 6.53 ± 1.09;manual: 6.53 ± 1.09 cm2) 0.64%, bone marrow fat (threshold: 3.12 ± 1.12; manual: 3.1 ± 1.11 cm2) 0.36%,knee extensor (threshold: 43.98 ± 7.66; manual: 44.61 ± 7.81 cm2) 1.78% and % intramuscular fat (threshold: 10.45 ± 4.29; manual: 10.92 ± 8.35%) 0.47%. Collectively, these results suggest that the threshold technique provided a robust accuracy in measuring the seven main thigh compartments, while greatly reducing the analysis time.

Key words: spinal cord injury, magnetic resonance imaging, semi-automated segmentation, subcutaneous adipose tissue, intramuscular fat