Neural Regeneration Research ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (9): 3885-3907.doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-25-00217

    Next Articles

Technical system of electroencephalography-based brain–computer interface: Advances, applications, and challenges

Hui Yu1, 2, 3, Qiyue Mu1, Chong Liu4, 5, Shuo Wang1, *, Jinglai Sun1, 2, 3, *   

  1. 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; 
    2State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Tianjin University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; 
    3Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China;
    4Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 4th Center Hospital, The Fourth Center Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; 
    5School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China
  • Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-05-15
  • Contact: Shuo Wang, ws111@tju.edu.cn; Jinglai Sun, sunjinglai@tju.edu.cn.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Health and Wellness Science and Technology Project of Tianjin, No. RC20013 (to CL); the Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Research Projects of Tianjin, No. 2019129 (to CL); the Scientific Research Project of Tianjin Education Commission, No. 2024ZXZD005 (to JS); and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Science and Technology Bureau, No. 25JCZDSN00010 (to JS).

Abstract:

Electroencephalography-based brain–computer interfaces have revolutionized the integration of neural signals with technological systems, offering transformative solutions across neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and clinical practice. This review systematically analyzes advancements in electroencephalography-based brain–computer interface architectures, emphasizing four pillars, namely signal acquisition, paradigm design, decoding algorithms, and diverse applications. The aim is to bridge the gap between technology and application and guide future research. In signal acquisition, noninvasive systems using wet, dry, and semi-dry electrodes are more comfortable and gentler on the skin compared to traditional methods. However, ensuring stable signal quality over long periods of time remains a challenge. Minimally invasive approaches, such as microneedle arrays and endovascular probes, achieve near-invasive signal fidelity without major surgery. Paradigm design explores task-specific neural encoders. Although motor imagery paradigms are widely used in rehabilitation, they require weeks of user training. Steady-state visually evoked potential and P300 speller paradigms enable rapid calibration, but cause visual and cognitive fatigue. Advanced systems currently combine electroencephalography with electromyography or eye-tracking to better handle real-world tasks. Decoding algorithms have advanced through Riemannian geometry for improved noise filtering, deep learning architectures for automated spatiotemporal feature extraction, and transfer learning frameworks to minimize cross-subject calibration. However, challenges remain in managing inconsistent electroencephalography, reducing processing demands, and ensuring compatibility across different electroencephalography devices. Clinical trials reveal a predominant focus on stroke rehabilitation, while emerging frontiers include astronaut neuro-monitoring in space exploration. Challenges include improving signal accuracy, minimizing movement interference, addressing ethical data concerns, and ensuring real-world use. Future advancements focus on biocompatible nanomaterials, adaptive algorithms, and multimodal integration, positioning electroencephalography-based brain–computer interfaces as pivotal tools in next-generation neurotechnology.

Key words: clinical trial, deep learning, diagnosis, electroencephalography paradigms, electrode, motor imagery, rehabilitation, sensor, steady-state visually evoked potential, transfer learning