中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 103-104.doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.314305

• 观点:视神经损伤修复保护与再生 • 上一篇    下一篇

当前和未来的视网膜神经退行性疾病治疗策略

  

  • 出版日期:2022-01-05 发布日期:2021-09-18

Current and future therapeutic strategies for the treatment of retinal neurodegenerative diseases

Victoria Maneu, Pedro Lax, Nicolás Cuenca*   

  1. Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain (Maneu V)
    Department of Physiology, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain (Lax P, Cuenca N) 
  • Online:2022-01-05 Published:2021-09-18
  • Contact: Nicolás Cuenca, PhD, cuenca@ua.es.
  • Supported by:
    The present work was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia e innovación FEDER-PID2019-106230RB-I00. Instituto Carlos III, RETICS-FEDER RD16/0008/0016. Retina Asturias/Cantabria. FARPE-FUNDALUCE. Generalitat Valenciana IDIFEDER/2017/064 (to NC).

摘要: Neural Regen Res:视网膜神经退行性疾病治疗策略:光遗传学或细胞和基因治疗
神经退行性疾病的病因复杂且大多是多重的,而且是未知的,它总是让位于一个复杂的死亡组织场景,涉及多种细胞介质和细胞类型。所有中枢神经系统的神经退行性疾病都有共同的机制,无论是否有遗传原因,其细胞死亡的基本机制彼此之间没有差异,也不是在帕金森氏症或阿尔茨海默氏症等其他中枢神经系统疾病中观察到的。对解决遗传性疾病寄予厚望的基因治疗,目前正从临床前检测转向临床治疗一些视网膜退行性疾病,由于RPE65基因突变导致的Leber先天性黑蒙,目前已取得了成功的成果。但是有希望的治疗方法仍然面临着相关的挑战。用于修正基因缺失的CRISP/Cas编辑工具需要修复与免疫反应相关的二次效应;干细胞方法必须获得受体中移植细胞的功能,以确保准确建立突触连接和细胞接触,并在精确图像处理方面取得成功;光遗传学还需要找到合适的载体,以在合适的细胞类型中传递和表达,避免载体系统的免疫排斥。基因和细胞为基础的疗法在生物成功的曲折道路上发展,而抗氧化剂(如叶黄素或玉米黄质)、抗炎药(如皮质类固醇或大麻素)的联合疗法,抗凋亡分子(如牛磺熊去氧胆酸或胰岛素原)是目前最广泛的治疗视网膜退行性疾病的药物。这些化合物有几个优点。它们可以减缓退化过程的进展,从而在一定时间内保持视觉能力。
来自西班牙拉力坎特大学的Nicolas Cuenca团队认为即使在视力完全丧失的情况下,也必须给予神经保护因子,因为它们可以改善非视觉功能,如控制昼夜节律和瞳孔收缩,就像大麻素介导改善P23H大鼠的昼夜节律一样,由含黑色素蛋白酶的光敏神经节细胞介导。非视觉视网膜功能也会影响记忆和抑郁。保留这部分细胞,虽然不会改善视觉功能,但一定会提高患者的生活质量,不容小觑。这些分子肯定会增加新疗法的成功率,因为它们可以为健康细胞提供一个适当的环境,作为基因移植或光遗传学方法的基质,而这在被死亡细胞包围的受损组织中很难成功。遗传物质可以潜在地结合到视网膜上,并最终恢复其注射区域的视觉功能,但如果不通过维持邻近细胞的健康而对整个视网膜进行整体刺激,发炎的周围环境可能会导致任何治疗的彻底失败。因此,同时使用抗炎、抗氧化和抗凋亡药物,以及神经营养和生长因子,将为健康细胞提供充足的环境,有助于实现视觉功能的持续功能恢复,正如在小鼠模型中显示的孕酮和硫辛酸的组合。发展新的治疗视网膜退行性疾病的新策略,将其视为光遗传学或细胞和基因治疗,为未来创造了良好的预期,但神经营养因子、抗氧化剂、抗炎和抗凋亡药物的使用,最好是结合使用,不仅我们目前最好的机会减缓疾病进展到失明,事实上,这些药物也需要保持相关的生理功能,还需要维持视网膜的稳态,这将决定基因治疗后能否取得成功。
    文章在《中国神经再生研究(英文版)》杂志2022年 1 月 1 期发表。

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-5710 (Nicolás Cuenca) 

Abstract: The complex and mostly multiple and unknown aetiology of neurodegenerative diseases always give way to an intricate scenario of dying tissue that involves multiple cell mediators and cell types. All neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) share common mechanisms, regardless their origin: oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and cell death. Accordingly, retinal degenerative diseases, with or without a genetic cause, as retinitis pigmentosa (RP), glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or diabetic retinopathy (DR) do not differ in their basic mechanisms of cell death neither one to another, nor from those observed in other CNS diseases as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s (Cuenca et al., 2014). Indeed, the therapeutic findings should be able to be more or less easily extrapolated between these conditions, as far as they are directed to common dartboards. Gene therapy, in which we have very high hopes to solve genetic disorders, is currently being traslated from preclinical assays to the clinic for some retinal degenerative diseases, with successful achievement up today for the Leber congenital amaurosis, due to mutations in the RPE65 gene (Garafalo et al., 2020). But our promising therapies still face relevant challenges. In this sense, CRISP/Cas editing tools used to amend genetic missenses, need to fix secondary effects, as those related to the immune response (Yu et al., 2017); stem cell approaches have to procure the functionality of transplanted cells in the recipient, to assure the accurate establishment of synaptic connectivity and cell contacts, and gain success in precise image processing (Cuevas et al., 2019; Garita-Hernandez et al., 2019); and optogenetics also needs to find appropriate vectors for the delivery and expression in suitable cell types, avoiding immunological rejection of the vector systems (Shen et al., 2020). While gene- and cell-based therapies evolve through the tortuous pathway of biological success, combined therapies with antioxidant (as lutein or zeaxanthin), antiinflammatory (as corticosteroids or cannabinoids), and antiapoptotic (as tauroursodeoxycholic acid or proinsulin) molecules appear currently as the widest approach to pharmacologically treat a wide spectrum of retinal degenerative diseases. These compounds provide several advantages. They can slow down the progression of the degenerative process, so preserving the visual capacity for a certain time. Moreover, the administration of neuroprotective factors is essential even when the vision has been completely lost, as they can improve non-visual functions, like the control of circadian rhythms and pupil contraction, as the cannabinoid-mediated improvement of circadian rhythmicity in P23H rats, which are mediated by the melanopsin-containing photosensitive ganglion cells (Lax et al., 2019). Non-visual retinal functions have also effects on memory and depression. Therefore, the preservation of this subset of cells, although will not improve the visual function, will surely improve the quality of life of the patients and should not be underestimated. But, far beyond, these molecules will surely increase the success of the new therapies, as they can provide an adequate environment of healthy cells, as a substrate for gene transplant or optogenetic approaches, which could hardly be successful in a damaged tissue surrounded by dying cells. Genetic material can be potentially incorporated to the retina and eventually restore the visual functionality in the zone in which it is injected but, without a global actuation on the whole retina by maintaining the health of the adjacent cells, an inflamed surrounding could end in a complete failure of any therapy. Hence, the concomitant use of antiinflammatory, antioxidant and antiapoptotic agents, as well as neurotrophic and growth factors, will provide an adequate environment of healthy cells that will help to achieve a sustained functional restoration of the visual function (Figure 1), as it has been shown for the combination of progesterone and lipoic acid in a mouse model of RP (Ramirez-Lamelas et al., 2018).