中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10): 4642-4652.doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-25-00674

• 综述:脑损伤修复保护与再生 • 上一篇    下一篇

脑卒中后认知障碍的机制与生物标志物

  

  • 出版日期:2026-10-15 发布日期:2026-06-11
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82260249,82560250); 江西省自然科学基金(20232BAB206046);中国九江市自然科学基金(S2024KXJJ0001)

Mechanisms and biomarkers of poststroke cognitive impairment

Mengxia Liu1, 2, #, Manqing Zhang3, #, Zhiying Chen2, 4, Bing Bao2, 4, Yanghang Chen2, 4, Fangfang Wang1, Min Jiang4, Moxin Wu1, 4, *, Xiaoping Yin2, 4, *   

  1. 1Department of Medical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, China; 
    2Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, China; 
    3Medical College of Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, China; 
    4Jiujiang Clinical Precision Medicine Research Center, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, China
  • Online:2026-10-15 Published:2026-06-11
  • Contact: Moxin Wu, PhD, mxwu1986@jju.edu.cn; Xiaoping Yin, PhD, xiaopingbuxiao@126.com.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 82260249 (to XY), 82560250 (to MW); the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province in China, No. 20232BAB206046 (to MW); the Natural Science Foundation of Jiujiang in China, No. S2024KXJJ0001 (to MW).

摘要:

脑卒中后认知障碍是卒中患者常见的神经系统并发症,表现为从轻度认知障碍到血管性痴呆的渐进性认知衰退,显著影响患者生活质量及长期预后。近年来研究逐步揭示了脑卒中后认知障碍的多维病理生理机制。文章详细介绍了脑卒中后认知障碍的机制与生物标志物。在分子层面,脑卒中后认知障碍的发生涉及多层次、相互关联的病理生理变化,其中神经炎症激活与氧化应激损伤被视为关键启动因子;同时,氧化应激诱导的活性氧积累可进一步促进脑卒中后认知障碍发生。伴随血脑屏障通透性增加,外周炎症细胞浸润及毒性物质进入脑组织加剧神经损伤。在神经递质系统层面,兴奋性与抑制性神经递质系统失衡直接影响突触可塑性及神经网络整合功能。结构层面,白质微结构完整性受损,表现为髓鞘丧失与轴突运输障碍。这些多层次病理改变通过复杂的正反馈机制相互作用,共同构筑了脑卒中后认知障碍的致病网络。在生物标志物研究领域,文章创新性地建立了脑卒中后认知障碍生物标志物的六维分类体系,系统性地将相关标志物划分为代谢标志物、炎性因子谱、遗传标志物、血脑屏障损伤指标、肠道菌群特征及神经影像标志物。值得关注的是,通过整合血清生物标志物与多模态神经影像特征构建的综合预测模型,显著提升了脑卒中后认知障碍的诊断特异性。这种多维度系统化研究方法为深入解析脑卒中后认知障碍发病机制提供了新视角,并为早期临床干预提供了重要靶点。未来我们期望通过动态监测这些生物标志物的时间变化,更精准评估干预措施的有效性,指导治疗方案的优化调整。基于风险评估结果,应实施分层管理策略:高危患者每3个月进行认知评估与生物标志物检测,中低危患者则遵循阶梯式监测方案。该精准管理模式可提前6-12个月预测认知衰退风险,实现及时干预以降低重度认知障碍发生率。针对脑卒中后认知障碍的机制研究与生物标志物发现为临床诊疗带来突破性进展。未来研究应持续探索其分子机制,开发更高效的靶向治疗药物,建立综合性预警与个性化治疗体系,最终实现脑卒中后认知障碍的精准防控与优化管理。


https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-3657 (Moxin Wu); https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7121-7077 (Xiaoping Yin)

关键词: 生物标志物, 血脑屏障, 脱髓鞘, 炎症小体, 神经炎症, 神经影像学, 氧化应激, 卒中后认知障碍, 脑卒中, 白质病变

Abstract: Poststroke cognitive impairment is a common neurological complication in stroke patients, characterized by progressive cognitive decline ranging from mild cognitive impairment to vascular dementia, significantly impacting patients’ quality of life and long-term prognosis. Recent studies have gradually unveiled the multidimensional pathophysiological mechanisms underlying post-stroke cognitive impairment. This review provides a detailed introduction to the mechanisms and biomarkers of poststroke cognitive impairment. At the molecular level, the development of poststroke cognitive impairment involves multi-level and interconnected pathophysiological changes. Among these, the activation of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress damage are considered key initiating factors. Concurrently, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species induced by oxidative stress can further promote the occurrence of poststroke cognitive impairment. Increased blood–brain barrier permeability, along with the infiltration of peripheral inflammatory cells and the entry of toxic substances into the brain, exacerbates neural damage. In terms of neurotransmitter systems, the imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter systems directly affects synaptic plasticity and the integration of neural networks. Structurally, the integrity of white matter microstructure is compromised, manifesting as myelin loss and axonal transport impairment. These multi-level pathological changes interact through complex positive feedback mechanisms, collectively forming the pathogenic network of poststroke cognitive impairment. In the field of biomarker research, a six-dimensional classification system for post-stroke cognitive impairment biomarkers has been reported, systematically categorizing relevant biomarkers into metabolic markers, inflammatory factor profiles, genetic markers, blood–brain barrier damage indicators, gut microbiota characteristics, and neuroimaging biomarkers. Notably, the integrated predictive model developed by combining serum biomarkers with multimodal neuroimaging features significantly enhances the diagnostic specificity of poststroke cognitive impairment biomarkers. This multidimensional and systematic research approach provides new perspectives for the in-depth analysis of the pathogenesis of poststroke cognitive impairment biomarkers and offers important targets for early clinical intervention. In the future, it is hoped that dynamic monitoring of the temporal changes in these biomarkers can more accurately assess the effectiveness of interventions and guide the optimization and adjustment of treatment plans. Based on risk assessment results, a tiered management approach should be implemented: high-risk patients should undergo cognitive assessments and biomarker testing every three months, while moderate-to-low-risk patients should follow a stepwise monitoring protocol. This precision management model can predict the risk of cognitive decline up to 6–12 months in advance, enabling timely interventions to reduce the incidence of severe cognitive impairment. Mechanistic studies and biomarker discovery for poststroke cognitive impairment have brought breakthrough progress to clinical diagnosis and treatment. Future research should continue to explore its molecular mechanisms, develop more effective targeted therapeutic drugs, establish a comprehensive early warning and personalized treatment system, and ultimately achieve precise prevention, control, and optimized management of poststroke cognitive impairment. 

Key words: biomarkers, blood–brain barrier, demyelination, inflammasomes, neuroinflammation, neuroimaging, oxidative stress, poststroke cognitive impairment, stroke, white matter