中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2013, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 233-243.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.03.005
收稿日期:
2012-07-28
修回日期:
2012-10-10
出版日期:
2013-01-25
发布日期:
2013-01-25
Junming Tan1, Jiangang Shi2, Guodong Shi2, Yanling Liu3, Xiaohong Liu3, Chaoyang Wang1, Dechun Chen1, Shunming Xing1, Lianbing Shen1, Lianshun Jia2, Xiaojian Ye2, Hailong He2, Jiashun Li2
Received:
2012-07-28
Revised:
2012-10-10
Online:
2013-01-25
Published:
2013-01-25
Contact:
Jiangang Shi, M.D., Associate professor, Chief physician, Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China, tanjunm@sina.com.
About author:
Junming Tan☆, M.D., Associate chief physician, Associate professor, Master’s supervisor.
Supported by:
This study was financially supported by grants from the Medical Scientific Fund and Intensive Research of Nanjing Military Area Command of Chinese PLA, No. Nan 2007-13 and Nan 08Z003; and the Medical Scientific Fund and Research of Chinese PLA during the 12th Five-Year Plan Period, No. CWS11J260.
摘要:
实验以下腰骶部背根神经节的中央突受压缢48h制备犬急性多重马尾压缢模型,观察鞘内注射15mg可吸收缓释聚(乳酸-羟基乙酸)-脑源性神经营养因子纳米微球对犬背根神经节内神经元损伤的修复作用。分别于造模后1,2,4周取L7节段背根神经节行苏木精-伊红及免疫组化染色,发现鞘内给予脑源性神经营养因子可减轻受压迫的背根神经节感觉神经元变性和炎性反应,提高受压迫的背根神经节感觉神经元内脑源性神经营养因子的表达。同时鞘内给予脑源性神经营养因子可显著改善急性多重马尾压缢模型犬的神经功能。结果证实鞘内注射持续缓慢释放的脑源性神经营养因子纳米粒,可促进急性重度马尾综合征犬神经元组织形态及功能的修复。
. 脑源性神经营养因子纳米微球对马尾束缢犬的神经保护[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2013, 8(3): 233-243.
Junming Tan, Jiangang Shi, Guodong Shi, Yanling Liu, Xiaohong Liu, Chaoyang Wang, Dechun Chen, Shunming Xing, Lianbing Shen, Lianshun Jia, Xiaojian Ye, Hailong He, Jiashun Li. Changes in compressed neurons from dogs with acute and severe cauda equina constrictions following intrathecal injection of brain-derived neurotrophic factor-conjugated polymer nanoparticles[J]. Neural Regeneration Research, 2013, 8(3): 233-243.
[1] Hasue M. Pain and the nerve root. An interdisciplinary approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(14):2053-2058.[2] Obata K, Noguchi K. BDNF in sensory neurons and chronic pain. Neurosci Res. 2006;55(1):1-10.[3] Liu Y, Kim D, Himes BT, et al. Transplants of fibroblasts genetically modified to express BDNF promote regeneration of adult rat rubrospinal axons and recovery of forelimb function. J Neurosci. 1999;19(11):4370-4387.[4] Liu Y, Himes BT, Murray M, et al. Grafts of BDNF- producing fibroblasts rescue axotomized rubrospinal neurons and prevent their atrophy. Exp Neurol. 2002;178(2):150-164. [5] Fraser S, Roberts L, Murphy E. Cauda equina syndrome: a literature review of its definition and clinical presentation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(11):1964-1968.[6] Marsala J, Sulla I, Jalc P, et al. Multiple protracted cauda equina constrictions cause deep derangement in the lumbosacral spinal cord circuitry in the dog. Neurosci Lett. 1995;193(2):97-100.[7] Orendácová J, Cízková D, Kafka J, et al. Cauda equina syndrome. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;64(6):613-637.[8] Orendácová J, Marsala M, Cízková D, et al. Fos protein expression in sacral spinal cord in relation to early phase of cauda equina syndrome in dogs. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2001;21(4):413-419.[9] Kasahara K, Nakagawa T, Kubota T. Neuronal loss and expression of neurotrophic factors in a model of rat chronic compressive spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(18):2059-2066.[10] van Gelderen C. Ein orthotisches (lordotisches) kaudasyndrom. Acta Psychiat Scand. 1948;23(1-2):57-68.[11] Verbiest H. Further experiences on the pathological influence of a developmental narrowness of the bony lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1955; 37-B(4):576-583.[12] Brish A, Lerner MA, Braham J. Intermittent claudication from compression of cauda equina by a narrowed spinal canal. J Neurosurg. 1964;21:207-211.[13] Graveleau J, Guiot G. Congenital narowness of the lumbar spinal canal and sensitivo-motor intermittent claudication syndrome of the cauda equina. Presse Med. 1964;72: 3344-3348.[14] Vacca VM Jr. Cauda equina syndrome. Nursing. 2012; 42(5):72.[15] Vanelderen P, Rouwette T, Kozicz T, et al. The role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in different animal models of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(5): 473.e1-9.[16] Delamarter RB, Bohlman HH, Bodner D, et al. Urologic function after experimental cauda equina compression. Cystometrograms versus cortical-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(9):864-870.[17] Porter RW, Ward D. Cauda equina dysfunction. The significance of two-level pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17(1):9-15.[18] Olmarker K, Holm S, Rydevik B. Importance of compression onset rate for the degree of impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression injury of the porcine cauda equina. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15: 416-419.[19] Ooi Y, Mita F, Satoh Y. Myeloscopic study on lumbar spinal canal stenosis with special reference to intermittent claudication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(6):544-549.[20] Mao GP, Konno S, Arai I, et al. Chronic double-level cauda equina compression. An experimental study on the dog cauda equina with analyses of nerve conduction velocity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(15):1641-1644.[21] Konno S, Yabuki S, Sato K, et al. A model for acute, chronic, and delayed graded compression of the dog cauda equina. Presentation of the gross, microscopic, and vascular anatomy of the dog cauda equina and accuracy in pressure transmission of the compression model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:2758-2764.[22] Sato K, Konno S, Yabuki S, et al. A model for acute, chronic, and delayed graded compression of the dog cauda equina. Neurophysiologic and histologic changes induced by acute, graded compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(22):2386-2391.[23] Sato K, Kikuchi S. Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the cauda equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(16):1898-1903.[24] Marsala J, Kafka J, Lukácová N, et al. Cauda equina syndrome and nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity in the spinal cord of the dog. Physiol Res. 2003;52(4):481-496.[25] Schönström N, Bolender NF, Spengler DM, et al. Pressure changes within the cauda equina following constriction of the dural sac. An in vitro experimental study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(6):604-607.[26] Schonstrom NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM. The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985;10(9): 806-811.[27] Groves MJ, Christopherson T, Giometto B, et al. Axotomy-induced apoptosis in adult rat primary sensory neurons. J Neurocytol. 1997;26(9):615-624. [28] Vestergaard S, Tandrup T, Jakobsen J. Effect of permanent axotomy on number and volume of dorsal root ganglion cell bodies. J Comp Neurol. 1997;388(2):307-312.[29] Schmalbruch H. Motoneuron death after sciatic nerve section in newborn rats. J Comp Neurol. 1984;224(2): 252-258.[30] Kobayashi S, Yoshizawa H, Yamada S. Pathology of lumbar nerve root compression. Part 2: morphological and immunohistochemical changes of dorsal root ganglion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):180-188.[31] Nathaniel EJ, Nathaniel DR. Electron microscopic studies of spinal ganglion cells following crushing of dorsal roots in adult rat. J Ultrastruct Res. 1973;45(3):168-182.[32] McCall J, Weidner N, Blesch A. Neurotrophic factors in combinatorial approaches for spinal cord regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349(1):27-37. [33] Matsuoka Y, Yang J. Selective inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 blocks nerve growth factor to brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling and suppresses the development of and reverses already established pain behavior in rats. Neuroscience. 2012; 206:224-236.[34] Lin YT, Ro LS, Wang HL, et al. Up-regulation of dorsal root ganglia BDNF and trkB receptor in inflammatory pain: an in vivo and in vitro study. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:126.[35] Tonra JR, Curtis R, Wong V, et al. Axotomy upregulates the anterograde transport and expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by sensory neurons. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(11):4374-4383.[36] Bregman BS. Spinal cord transplants permit the growth of serotonergic axons across the site of neonatal spinal cord transection. Brain Res. 1987;431(2):265-279.[37] Nakamura M, Bregman BS. Differences in neurotrophic factor gene expression profiles between neonate and adult rat spinal cord after injury. Exp Neurol. 2001;169(2): 407-415.[38] Xu K, Uchida K, Nakajima H, et al. Targeted retrograde transfection of adenovirus vector carrying brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene prevents loss of mouse (twy/twy) anterior horn neurons in vivo sustaining mechanical compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(17): 1867-1874.[39] Kishino A, Nakayama C. Enhancement of BDNF and activated-ERK immunoreactivity in spinal motor neurons after peripheral administration of BDNF. Brain Res. 2003; 964(1):56-66.[40] Blits B, Boer GJ, Verhaagen J. Pharmacological, cell, and gene therapy strategies to promote spinal cord regeneration. Cell Transplant. 2002;11(6):593-613. [41] Novikova LN, Novikov LN, Kellerth JO. Survival effects of BDNF and NT-3 on axotomized rubrospinal neurons depend on the temporal pattern of neurotrophin administration. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12(2):776-780. [42] Acheson A, Conover JC, Fandl JP, et al. A BDNF autocrine loop in adult sensory neurons prevents cell death. Nature.1995;374(6521):450-453.[43] Tong JX, Eichler ME, Rich KM. Intracellular calcium levels influence apoptosis in mature sensory neurons after trophic factor deprivation. Exp Neurol. 1996;138(1):45-52.[44] Liu M, Kang ND, Yu EH. Changs of expression of c-fos gene and BDNF in neocortex induced by audiogenic kindling. Shenjing Jiepou Xue Zazhi. 2002;18(3):243-246.[45] Frisén J, Verge VM, Cullheim S, et al. Increased levels of trkB mRNA and trkB protein-like immunoreactivity in the injured rat and cat spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(23):11282-11286.[46] Uchida K, Baba H, Maezawa Y, et al. Histological investigation of spinal cord lesions in the spinal hyperostotic mouse (twy/twy): morphological changes in anterior horn cells and immunoreactivity to neurotropic factors. J Neurol. 1998;245(12):781-793.[47] Uchida K, Baba H, Maezawa Y, et al. Increased expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in the mechanically compressed spinal cord of the spinal hyperostotic mouse (twy/twy). Acta Neuropathol. 2003; 106(1):29-36.[48] Kwon BK, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF, et al. Strategies to promote neural repair and regeneration after spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(17 Suppl):S3-13.[49] The Ministry of Science and Technology of the People s Republic of China. Guidance Suggestions for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 2006-09-30.[50] Tan JM, Shi JG, Shi GD, et al. Influence on dorsal root ganglion after acute and severe cauda equina constrictions and intrathecal injection of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in experimental dogs. Jizhu Waike Zazhi. 2009;7(4):201-204.[51] Yaksh TL, Rathbun ML, Dragani JC, et al. Kinetic and safety studies on intrathecally infused recombinant- methionyl human brain-derived neurotrophic factor in dogs. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997;38(1):89-100.[52] Song YM, Yang Z, Lei J. Experimental study on effect of anlsodamine for traction injury of spinal cord in rabbit. Zhongguo Jizhu Jisui Zahzi. 1999;9(4):208-211. |
[1] | . 脑源性神经营养因子及相关酶和受体在脑缺氧缺血损伤后起重要作用[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(8): 1453-1459. |
[2] | . 丰富环境联合法舒地尔抑制海马CA1区神经元死亡减轻记忆障碍[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(8): 1460-1466. |
[3] | . 蝶翅应用于临床组织工程化神经移植材料的生物相容性和安全性[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(8): 1606-1612. |
[4] | . 神经基质膜包裹周围神经损伤的安全和有效性:一项随机单盲多中心临床试验[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(8): 1652-1659. |
[5] | . 硫化氢可增强帕金森病小鼠模型的成年神经发生[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(7): 1353-1358. |
[6] | . 常压氧可减轻缺血性脑卒中的高糖酵解[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(6): 1017-1023. |
[7] | . Apelin-13抑制脑缺血再灌注损伤后的细胞凋亡和过度自噬[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(6): 1044-1051. |
[8] | . 山楂叶总黄酮可抑制脊髓损伤后的细胞凋亡并促进运动功能恢复[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(2): 350-356. |
[9] | . 促进缺血视网膜神经元DNA修复的糖原合酶激酶3β抑制剂SB216763[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(2): 394-400. |
[10] | . 敲除Krüppel样因子4基因可促进哺乳动物轴突再生?[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(1): 166-171. |
[11] | . 氩气抑制视网膜缺血再灌注损伤后小胶质细胞活化和炎性细胞因子的表达[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2021, 16(1): 192-198. |
[12] | . 改良强制性运动可改变大脑中动脉闭塞模型大鼠对侧海马的突触可塑性[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2020, 15(6): 1045-1057. |
[13] | . 氧糖剥夺大脑皮质神经元中前蛋白转化酶1/3可介导脑源性神经营养因子表达下调[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2020, 15(6): 1066-1070. |
[14] | . CXCR7中和抗体对脑缺血慢性期海马齿状回神经再生认知功能的影响[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2020, 15(6): 1079-1085. |
[15] | . 牛膝多肽抑制谷氨酸电流在培养海马神经元发挥抗凋亡作用[J]. 中国神经再生研究(英文版), 2020, 15(6): 1086-1093. |
A randomized, controlled animal experiment.
The experiment was performed at the Animal Care and Use Department of the Navy Institute,
A total of 18 adult mongrel male dogs, aged 18–48 months and weighing 10–15 kg, were purchased from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Navy (license No. SYXK (Hu) 2007-0003). Animals were housed in individual runs, given free access to water and fed a dry certified canine diet. Animal room temperature and light cycle were controlled (targeted conditions: temperature range 18.3–25.5°C, 12-hour light/dark cycle). Humidity was not controlled but recorded regularly. Dogs were allowed to acclimate for a minimum of 7 days after receipt and conditioned to vests for 3 days prior to surgery. All protocols were conducted in accordance with the Guidance Suggestions for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, formulated by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China[49].
Model establishment and intervention
Each animal received intramuscular injection (i.m.) of penicillin G procaine (20 000 U/kg) and atropine (0.04 mg/kg) before surgery. Dogs were anesthetized with a parenteral solution of Su-mian-xin II (0.08– 0.10 mL/kg, i.m., made by the Military Veterinarian Institute of the
The central processes of the L7–Co5 DRG neurons were permanently constricted. The sham surgery group underwent cauda equina exposure, without ligation. Forty-eight hours after surgery, dogs from both control and experimental groups were again deeply anesthetized with the Su-mian-xinII (0.08–0.10 mL/kg, i.m.). The four constrictions on the cauda equina were removed through the original operative incision, and dogs in the experimental group were infused through intrathecal injection with 15 mg of encapsulated biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles carrying 2.5 mg of active BDNF (Pharmacy College of the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China).
DRG (L7) preparation
Two animals, one from the control and experimental groups separately, were deeply anesthetized with the Su-mian-xin II (0.08–0.10 mL/kg, i.m.) after 1, 2 and 4 weeks following the second operation. Animals were transcardially perfused through the heart with 2 L PBS followed by 2 L of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4). The corresponding DRG (L7) was removed and sliced into 5-µm transverse paraffin sections for histological and immunohistochemical study.
Neuronal changes and damage in compressed DRG, observed by hematoxylin-eosin staining
Samples were taken from DRG at L7 and embedded in paraffin, before preparing 5-µm transverse sections. The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and examined for the density of neurons in the DRG, and then observed using a light microscope (Olympus,
Semiquantitative scoring of pathological sections was performed independently by two pathological investigators who were blinded to the animal groups. Thus, tissue sections from each block were described qualitatively with local reactions, local inflammatory cells, and pathological change, such as chromatolysis, neuronal loss, edema or necrosis being noted. For comparison purposes, material from each animal was rated on a semiquantitative scale of 0 to IV, where 0 represented a lack of pathological findings and IV represented a severe inflammatory reaction that involved corresponding tissues and structures. These values were reported and submitted for a rank order comparison[51].
Immunohistochemical staining for BDNF expression in DRG neurons
Samples were immersed in PBS containing 30% sucrose for 24 hours at 4°C for cryoprotection. Free floating sections were immediately sliced into 5-µm paraffin sections, deparaffinized and dehydrated. Sections were subsequently washed in distilled water and then PBS, followed by microwave retrieval with citrate buffer solution (pH 6.0) for 3 minutes and 30 seconds. Sections were then rinsed in distilled water and PBS again after natural cooling. Specimens were exposed to 0.3% H2O2 in PBS for 10 minutes to inactivate endogenous peroxidase, and then rinsed in PBS. Sections were subsequently incubated with a rabbit monoclonal anti-BDNF antibody of low-density lipoprotein (1:50; Boster Biotech Corp,
Neurofunctional evaluation
Neurological evaluation of motor function in the posterior limbs of each animal was performed independently by two investigators blinded to the animal groups. Each animal was graded three times for 40 minutes each time according to the Tarlov’s scoring system[51]. The average value was obtained before deep anesthesia and transcardial perfusion.
The ratio of Tarlov’s motor scales was applied to assess neurological function. The calculation used is shown below[52]:
Nonparametric Wilcoxon’s signed-ranks test was used to compare the semiquantitative scoring of the three groups using SPSS 10.0 software (SPSS,
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||