中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2016, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (10): 1584-1590.doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.193236

• 原著:脑损伤修复保护与再生 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同频率重复经颅磁刺激对亚急性期脑梗死患者上肢运动功能恢复有差异吗?

  

  • 收稿日期:2016-08-02 出版日期:2016-10-31 发布日期:2016-10-31

E?ects of di?erent frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with subacute cerebral infarction

Jiang Li1, 2, *, Xiang-min Meng2, Ru-yi Li2, Ru Zhang2, Zheng Zhang2, Yi-feng Du1, *   

  1. 1 Shandong Provincial Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China 2 Afliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2016-08-02 Online:2016-10-31 Published:2016-10-31
  • Contact: Jiang Li or Yi-feng Du, lijiang_67@163.com or duyifeng2013@163.com.

摘要:

有研究证实,低频重复经颅磁刺激可抑制皮质神经元活性,而高频重复经颅磁刺激能提高皮质神经元的兴奋性,但两者对脑梗死后的上肢运动功能恢复有何差异,目前研究较少。我们假设对脑梗死恢复期患者进行不同频率的重复经颅磁刺激,可对上肢运动功能恢复能产生不同的效果。试验纳入伴有上肢功能障碍的亚急性期脑梗死患者127例,随机分为3组,其中低频组42例:病变对侧大脑半球主要运动皮质区(M1)1 Hz重复经颅磁刺激;高频组43例:给予病灶同侧M1区10 Hz重复经颅磁刺激;假刺激组42例:病灶侧M1区10 Hz的频率的假刺激,刺激时间与高频治疗组相同,每次135 s。治疗2周后,与治疗前比较,各组动作诱发电位潜伏期、中枢运动传导时间均显著降低,上肢运动功能评分明显改善,低频组和高频组分别与假刺激组比较上述指标差异均有显著性意义,但低频组和高频组之间差异不显著。结果说明,低频和高频重复经颅磁刺激均可改善脑梗死患者上肢运动功能,且两者治疗效果相似。 

orcid: 0000-0002-4395-5048 (Jiang Li)

关键词: 神经再生, 脑损伤, 经颅磁刺激, 重复经颅磁刺激, 低频刺激, 高频刺激, 脑梗死, 上肢运动功能, 大脑皮质, 卒中康复, 运动诱发电位, 中枢运动传导时间, 运动皮质, 神经可塑性, 神经元重组

Abstract: Studies have confirmed that low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can decrease the activity of cortical neurons, and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can increase the excitability of cortical neurons. However, there are few studies concerning the use of di?erent frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper-limb motor function afer cerebral infarction. We hypothesized that di?erent frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebral infarction would produce di?erent e?ects on the recovery of upper-limb motor function. Tis study enrolled 127 patients with upper-limb dysfunction during the subacute phase of cerebral infarction. Tese patients were randomly assigned to three groups. Te low-frequency group comprised 42 patients who were treated with 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the contralateral hemisphere primary motor cortex (M1). Te high-frequency group comprised 43 patients who were treated with 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral M1. Finally, the sham group comprised 42 patients who were treated with 10 Hz of false stimulation on ipsilateral M1. A total of 135 seconds of stimulation was applied in the sham group and high-frequency group. At 2 weeks afer treatment, cortical latency of motor-evoked potentials and central motor conduction time were signifcantly lower compared with before treatment. Moreover, motor function scores were signifcantly improved. Te above indices for the low- and high-frequency groups were signifcantly di?erent compared with the sham group. However, there was no signifcant di?erence between the low- and high-frequency groups. Te results show that low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can similarly improve upper-limb motor function in patients with cerebral infarction.

Key words: nerve regeneration, brain injury, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, cerebral infarction, low-frequency stimulation, high-frequency stimulation, upper-limb motor function, cerebral cortex, stroke rehabilitation, motor-evoked potential, central motor conduction time, primary motor cortex, neuroplasticity, neural reorganization, neural regeneration