中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 81-95.doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00828

• 综述:神经损伤修复保护与再生 • 上一篇    下一篇

GABAAR 激动剂麻醉剂在神经发育过程中的双重效应:从神经毒性到麻醉治疗,脆弱大脑中的 "数学难题”

  

  • 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2025-04-19

Dual effects of GABAAR agonist anesthetics in neurodevelopment and vulnerable brains: From neurotoxic to therapeutic effects

Dihan Lu, Wen Zhang, Keyu Chen, Xia Feng*   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • Online:2026-01-15 Published:2025-04-19
  • Contact: Xia Feng, MD, PhD, fengxia@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

摘要:

围绕全身麻醉对发育中大脑的具体影响的争论已经持续了30多年,并逐渐形成了以下结论:长期、反复、高剂量的手术和麻醉暴露会导致行为和执行功能缺陷的发生率较高,而单次暴露则会对长期神经功能造成轻微影响。这篇综述总结了作为代表性镇静剂的γ-氨基丁酸A型受体激动剂在发育中大脑或中枢神经系统疾病中的剂量-神经保护/神经毒性效应。虽然大多数临床前研究表明,麻醉剂通过各种信号通路作为潜在机制对发育产生神经毒性影响,但最近探索低剂量麻醉剂的研究表明,它们可能会在这一关键时期促进神经发育。这一结果违背了药理学研究的一般原则,足以引起研究人员的兴趣。因此,异丙酚和七氟烷等麻醉剂对发育中的大脑产生双重作用的阈值是多少?使用到什么程度才能最大限度地发挥其保护作用?其中涉及哪种基本机制?这个问题实质上已成为一个“数学难题”。文章在总结了γ-氨基丁酸A型受体激动剂在发育中大脑和中枢神经系统疾病中的剂量依赖方式后,认为所有这些麻醉剂都会表现出特定的阈值效应,每种药物都有其独特性,根据不同的大脑功能状态,从神经保护到神经毒性不等。然而,不同药物在不同大脑状态下的特定阈值的确切数值,以及这种阈值存在的内在机制,目前仍是空白。对这一问题的进一步深入探讨将极大地提高这些麻醉药的治疗转化价值。

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8182-9803 (Xia Feng)

关键词: 大脑, 中枢神经系统, 认知大脑, 中枢神经系统, 认知, γ-氨基丁酸A型受体受体激动剂, 全麻药, 神经发生, 神经系统疾病, 神经保护, 神经毒性, 信号通路

Abstract: Debates regarding the specific effects of general anesthesia on developing brains have persisted for over 30 years. A consensus has been reached that prolonged, repeated, high-dose exposure to anesthetics is associated with a higher incidence of deficits in behavior and executive function, while single exposure has a relatively minor effect on long-term neurological function. In this review, we summarize the dose-dependent neuroprotective or neurotoxic effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists, a representative group of sedatives, on developing brains or central nervous system diseases. Most preclinical research indicates that anesthetics have neurotoxic effects on the developing brain through various signal pathways. However, recent studies on low-dose anesthetics suggest that they may promote neurodevelopment during this critical period. These findings are incomprehensible for the general “dose-effect” principles of pharmacological research, which has attracted researchers’ interest and led to the following questions: What is the threshold for the dual effects exerted by anesthetics such as propofol and sevoflurane on the developing brain? To what extent can their protective effects be maximized? What are the underlying mechanisms involved in these effects? Consequently, this issue has essentially become a “mathematical problem.” After summarizing the dose-dependent effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonist sedatives in both the developing brain and the brains of patients with central nervous system diseases, we believe that all such anesthetics exhibit specific threshold effects unique to each drug. These effects range from neuroprotection to neurotoxicity, depending on different brain functional states. However, the exact values of the specific thresholds for different drugs in various brain states, as well as the underlying mechanisms explaining why these thresholds exist, remain unclear. Further in-depth exploration of these issues could significantly enhance the therapeutic translational value of these anesthetics.

Key words: brain, central nervous system, cognition, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonist, general anesthetics, neurogenesis, neurological disorders, neuroprotection, neurotoxicity, signal pathway