中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (10): 1663-1668.doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.167767

• 原著:周围神经损伤修复保护与再生 • 上一篇    下一篇

外膜纵行小切口神经完全横断法构建坐骨神经损伤动物模型

  

  • 收稿日期:2015-08-06 出版日期:2015-10-28 发布日期:2015-10-28
  • 基金资助:

    河北省科技厅计划项目(142777105D)

The longitudinal epineural incision and complete nerve transection method for modeling sciatic nerve injury

Xing-long Cheng1, Pei Wang1, Bo Sun1, Shi-bo Liu1, Yun-feng Gao1, Xin-ze He2, Chang-yu Yu1, *   

  1. 1 Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei Province, China
    2 Graduate School of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei Province, China
  • Received:2015-08-06 Online:2015-10-28 Published:2015-10-28
  • Contact: Chang-yu Yu, M.D., cdgkwp@sina.com.
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by a grant from the Plan of the Department of Science and Technology of Hebei Province of China, No. 142777105D.

摘要:

既往构建周围神经损伤模型时,存在复制损伤程度复制准确、操作技术难度及神经再生修复优劣的困扰,限制着模型和动物周围神经再生修复研究的深入发展,为此,我们从解剖学角度讨论并叙述一种新的模型建立方法及思路,即外膜纵行小切口神经完全横断法,简便并稳定的制作周围神经Sunderland Ⅳ度损伤。实验组采用神经外膜纵形小切口完全横断法建立坐骨神经损伤大鼠模型,显微镜下纵形外膜3 mm小切口,全部神经纤维锐性切断,无需断端对位吻合修复,对照组采用神经完全横断法建立大鼠模型,显微镜下神经干锐性完全切断后外膜定点修复吻合。结果发现,术后第2、4周,两组损伤神经组织均出现典型的华勒氏变性。与对照组相比,术后第8、12周,实验组损伤坐骨神经髓神经纤维生长及轴突形成较明显,再生神经髓鞘同心圆排列整齐、致密,瘢痕形成少,术后12周损伤坐骨神经再生髓鞘形态正常且完整,板层排列紧密,术后4-12周坐骨神经损伤侧肢体运动及神经电传导恢复情况均较好。结果提示,外膜纵行小切口横断法控制外膜损伤后混合性神经纤维的完全横断,可稳定复制出周围神经Sunderland Ⅳ度损伤模型,对比完全横断法建模,降低了显微操作难度及手术时间,神经纤维断端对位良好,建模后损伤的神经再生及功能恢复良好。

关键词: 神经再生, 周围神经, 坐骨神经损伤, 动物模型, 外膜纵形小切口, 外膜控制损伤, 直视下损伤, 完全均等损伤, sunderland Ⅳ度, 神经再生修复

Abstract:

Injury severity, operative technique and nerve regeneration are important factors to consider when constructing a model of peripheral nerve injury. Here, we present a novel peripheral nerve injury model and compare it with the complete sciatic nerve transection method. In the experimental
group, under a microscope, a 3-mm longitudinal incision was made in the epineurium of the sciatic nerve to reveal the nerve fibers, which were then transected. The small, longitudinal incision in the epineurium was then sutured closed, requiring no stump anastomosis. In the control group, the sciatic nerve was completely transected, and the epineurium was repaired by anastomosis. At 2 and 4 weeks after surgery, Wallerian degeneration was observed in both groups. In the experimental group, at 8 and 12 weeks after surgery, distinct medullary nerve fibers and axons were observed in the injured sciatic nerve. Regular, dense myelin sheaths were visible, as well as some scarring. By 12 weeks, the myelin sheaths were normal and intact, and a tight lamellar structure was observed. Functionally, limb movement and nerve conduction recovered in the injured region between 4 and 12 weeks. The present results demonstrate that longitudinal
epineural incision with nerve transection can stably replicate a model of Sunderland grade IV peripheral nerve injury. Compared with the complete sciatic nerve transection model, our method reduced the difficulties of micromanipulation and surgery time, and resulted in good stump restoration, nerve regeneration, and functional recovery.

Key words: nerve regeneration, peripheral nerve, sciatic nerve injury, animal models, longitudinal epineural incision, Sunderland IV, nerve regeneration and repair, rats, neural regeneration