中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 502-509.doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.228756

• 原著:神经损伤修复保护与再生 • 上一篇    下一篇

壳聚糖与海藻酸钠支架材料修复大鼠脊髓损伤的效果

  

  • 收稿日期:2017-12-25 出版日期:2018-03-15 发布日期:2018-03-15
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(81671243,81373429)

Efficacy of chitosan and sodium alginate scaffolds for repair of spinal cord injury in rats

Zi-ang Yao, Feng-jia Chen, Hong-li Cui, Tong Lin, Na Guo, Hai-ge Wu   

  1. School of Life Science and Technology, Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China
  • Received:2017-12-25 Online:2018-03-15 Published:2018-03-15
  • Contact: Hai-ge Wu, Ph.D.,haige-hu@163.com.
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81671243 and 81373429.

摘要:

脊髓损伤会导致运动和感觉功能障碍,但成年哺乳动物脊髓神经元的自发再生能力有限。壳聚糖和海藻酸钠具有较好的生物相容性和生物可降解性,有助于受损皮肤、骨及神经等组织的恢复。实验分别将壳聚糖支架、海藻酸钠支架以及壳聚糖-海藻酸钠复合材料支架移植到大鼠脊髓半横断损伤部位,拟完成3种支架对脊髓损伤的修复作用的研究。BBB评分和电生理结果表明,壳聚糖支架能够促进脊髓损伤大鼠运动能力和神经传导功能的恢复。损伤后60 d,壳聚糖支架仍能使脊髓保持正常形态;相对于其他两组,在壳聚糖支架组大鼠脊髓损伤区域观察到较多的神经纤维再生的标志物高分子量神经丝蛋白阳性细胞和较少的瘢痕组织标志物胶质纤维酸性蛋白阳性细胞。由于海藻酸钠降解速度较快,海藻酸钠支架和复合材料支架并不能对损伤脊髓组织起到较好的支持和桥接作用。上述结果表明,与海藻酸钠和壳聚糖海藻酸钠复合支架材料相比,壳聚糖具有更好的生物相容性,能够更好的促进神经纤维的再生,阻止瘢痕组织的形成,从而更加有利于损伤脊髓的修复。

orcid:0000-0003-0412-0192(Hai-ge Wu)

关键词: 神经再生, 钙蛋白酶, 钙蛋白酶抑制蛋白, 中枢神经系统, 钙, 细胞凋亡, 自噬, B细胞淋巴瘤, 细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶, 线粒体通透性转换

Abstract:

Spinal cord injury results in the loss of motor and sensory pathways and spontaneous regeneration of adult mammalian spinal cord neurons is limited. Chitosan and sodium alginate have good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and are suitable to assist the recovery of damaged tissues, such as skin, bone and nerve. Chitosan scaffolds, sodium alginate scaffolds and chitosan-sodium alginate scaffolds were separately transplanted into rats with spinal cord hemisection. Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan locomotor rating scale scores and electrophysiological results showed that chitosan scaffolds promoted recovery of locomotor capacity and nerve transduction of the experimental rats.Sixty days after surgery, chitosan scaffolds retained the original shape of the spinal cord. Compared with sodium alginate scaffolds- and chitosan-sodium alginate scaffolds-transplanted rats, more neurofilament-H-immunoreactive cells (regenerating nerve fibers) and less glial fibrillary acidic protein-immunoreactive cells (astrocytic scar tissue) were observed at the injury site of experimental rats in chitosan scaffold-transplanted rats. Due to the fast degradation rate of sodium alginate, sodium alginate scaffolds and composite material scaffolds did not have a supporting and bridging effect on the damaged tissue. Above all, compared with sodium alginate and composite material scaffolds, chitosan had better biocompatibility, could promote the regeneration of nerve fibers and prevent the formation of scar tissue,and as such, is more suitable to help the repair of spinal cord injury.

Key words: nerve regeneration, spinal cord injury, chitosan, sodium alginate, functional recovery, scaffold, neurofilament-H, glial fibrillary acidic protein, scar tissue, locomotor capacity, neural regeneration