中国神经再生研究(英文版) ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 1961-1980.doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01322

• 综述:视神经损伤修复保护与再生 • 上一篇    下一篇

创伤性视神经病变的细胞疗法:最新进展、挑战与展望

  

  • 出版日期:2026-05-15 发布日期:2025-08-21
  • 基金资助:
    中国国家重点研发计划(2022YFA1105502);中国国家自然科学基金(82271123,32200618)。

Cell-based therapies for traumatic optic neuropathy: Recent advances, challenges, and perspectives

Yuanhui Wang1, 2, #, Moxin Chen1, 2, #, Zhimin Tang1, 2, *, Ping Gu1, 2, *   

  1. 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 2 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China
  • Online:2026-05-15 Published:2025-08-21
  • Contact: Zhimin Tang, PhD, zhimin888@sjtu.edu.cn; Ping Gu, PhD, guping2009@126.com.
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2022YFA1105502 (to PG); the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 82271123 (to PG), 32200618 (to ZT).

摘要:

创伤性视神经病变是一种由创伤引起的视神经病变,其病理生理机制包括原发性损伤和继发性损伤两个阶段,导致渐进性视网膜神经节细胞缺失和轴突变性。物理创伤、氧化应激、神经炎症和神经胶质瘢痕的形成都有助于疾病的发展,进一步加剧了视网膜神经节细胞的死亡。各种形式的细胞死亡,包括凋亡、热凋亡、坏死和铁凋亡,在疾病的不同阶段都起着作用。目前的创伤性视神经病变治疗方法(如类固醇疗法和手术)疗效有限,而基于细胞的疗法正在成为一种很有前景的方法,既能保护神经,又能使视网膜神经节细胞再生。文章的目的是综述创伤性视神经病变细胞疗法的最新研究进展。在细胞替代疗法方面,通过化学诱导分化或直接重编程从胚胎干细胞和诱导多能干细胞中提取的视网膜神经节细胞样细胞已被证明能融入宿主视网膜并存活数周至数月,具有潜在的视力功能益处。来自骨髓、脐带、胎盘和脂肪组织等不同来源的间充质干细胞已证明可促进视网膜神经节细胞存活、轴突再生和部分功能恢复。从人类胚胎干细胞提取的神经干细胞/祖细胞也能提供神经保护,并充当 “神经元中继站”,帮助将受损的视神经区域连接到视觉通路。细胞衍生产品(如细胞外囊泡和提取溶液)也显示出对神经保护的良好效果。然而,虽然创伤性视神经病变的细胞疗法已经取得了重大进展,但仍存在一些挑战,包括有限的整合和视觉功能恢复、最佳时机和给药方法,以及视网膜微环境和胶质细胞激活在神经保护和神经再生中的作用尚不明确。此外,观察期较长的研究以及对基于细胞的治疗方法对神经损伤性视网膜病变的治疗作用机制的深入了解也很有限。两项 I 期临床研究证明了细胞疗法治疗创伤性视神经病变的安全性和潜在益处,并观察到视力有所改善,但还需要进一步的研究来证实其显著效果。总之,细胞疗法为治疗强直性脊髓炎带来了巨大希望,但要实现功能性视神经再生,还必须克服严峻的挑战。新兴的生物工程策略,如基于支架的移植,可提高细胞存活率和轴突导向能力。未来的临床转化还依赖于严格的临床前实验验证、标准化方案和先进的成像技术。

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6996-5926 (Zhimin Tang); https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-1043 (Ping Gu)

关键词: 疾病模型, 胚胎干细胞, 细胞外囊泡, 间充质干细胞, 神经变性, 神经干细胞, 神经保护, 视神经损伤, 生理病理学, 再生医学, 视网膜神经节细胞, 干细胞移植

Abstract: Traumatic optic neuropathy is a form of optic neuropathy resulting from trauma. Its pathophysiological mechanisms involve primary and secondary injury phases, leading to progressive retinal ganglion cell loss and axonal degeneration. Contributing factors such as physical trauma, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and glial scar formation exacerbate disease progression and retinal ganglion cell death. Multiple forms of cell death—including apoptosis, pyroptosis, necroptosis, and ferroptosis— are involved at different disease stages. Although current treatments, such as corticosteroid therapy and surgical interventions, have limited efficacy, cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising approach that simultaneously promotes neuroprotection and retinal ganglion cell regeneration. This review summarizes recent advances in cell-based therapies for traumatic optic neuropathy. In the context of cell replacement therapy, retinal ganglion cell-like cells derived from embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells—via chemical induction or direct reprogramming—have demonstrated the ability to integrate into the host retina and survive for weeks to months, potentially improving visual function. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from various sources, including bone marrow, umbilical cord, placenta, and adipose tissue, have been shown to enhance retinal ganglion cell survival, stimulate axonal regeneration, and support partial functional recovery. Additionally, neural stem/progenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells offer neuroprotective effects and function as “neuronal relays,” facilitating reconnection between damaged regions of the optic nerve and the visual pathway. Beyond direct cell transplantation, cell-derived products, such as extracellular vesicles and cell-extracted solutions, have demonstrated promising neuroprotective effects in traumatic optic neuropathy. Despite significant progress, several challenges remain, including limited integration of transplanted cells, suboptimal functional vision recovery, the need for precise timing and delivery methods, and an incomplete understanding of the role of the retinal microenvironment and glial cell activation in neuroprotection and neuroregeneration. Furthermore, studies with longer observation periods and deeper mechanistic insights into the therapeutic effects of cell-based therapies remain scarce. Two Phase I clinical trials have confirmed the safety and potential benefits of cell-based therapy for traumatic optic neuropathy, with reported improvements in visual acuity. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings and establish significant therapeutic outcomes. In conclusion, cell-based therapies hold great promise for treating traumatic optic neuropathy, but critical obstacles must be overcome to achieve functional optic nerve regeneration. Emerging bioengineering strategies, such as scaffold-based transplantation, may improve cell survival and axonal guidance. Successful clinical translation will require rigorous preclinical validation, standardized protocols, and the integration of advanced imaging techniques to optimize therapeutic efficacy.

Key words: disease models, embryonic stem cells, extracellular vesicles, mesenchymal stem cells, nerve degeneration, neural stem cells, neuroprotection, optic nerve injuries, physiopathology, regenerative medicine, retinal ganglion cells, stem cell transplantation